Calculation During Course Of Their Learnin-Myassignmenthelp.Com

Questions: Is It Easy To Read And Understand; That Is, No Jargon Or Obscure Phraseology? What Did The Researchers Find And Are The Methods Of Analysis Appropriate Were The Suggestions Made Based On The Reported Findings? Is The Language Used Understandable? Is The Visual Material Easy To Follow And Clearly Marked? Is The Report Or Study Written In An Objective Style Or Are The Authors Biases And Viewpoints Apparent? Answers: Introducation The article is clear and easy to understand. By having a glimpse at it, the reader can quickly get a general idea about the article, grasping and understanding the content without getting into depth. The language is clear without jargons and obscure phraseology. The publication is recent year 2014 and topic relevant as it deals with difficulties facing nursing students currently learning in tertiary institutions when acquiring competency in medication calculation during the course of their learning. The article further outlines the most appropriate approach of learning for the students. The background of the study has clearly stated the topic, giving brief information of the study and stating explicitly the controversial issue and why this research has been carried out. The introduction gives the reader an overview of the study, slowly narrowing it down to the problem of the research study. For example, the writer describes briefly about the responsibility of universities in preparation of students for graduate practice being the main problem around the study. accounting writer gives strategies of how he intends to solve the research problem, and making the reader more curious to want to read further (Chan, 2010). Is there evidence of reliability and validity How were the subjects selected Are they a large or small group The researcher conducted the study through a survey of about 405 students undertaking their final year of study at a university in Australia. The methods used were online questions for simulated medical sums designed for clinical classes, the researcher also used tests on paper and hands on workshops on the current situations. There was evidence of reliability as the sample collected was a representation of the entire population that included the metropolitan university. The researcher also used qualitative survey questions were administered thematically and manually assisting the researcher to further identify the students awareness of their errors in medication calculations and their preferred mode of learning. The results were evidence that the research method used was reliable and valid (Ramjan, 2011). The researchers found out that students desired a hands-on contextualized style to learning that was real and one that was in line with their clinical practice. The methods used to analyse the data were appropriate. This research study can be compared to Simulation-based learning in nurse education: systematic review In professions of healthcare, learning using practice based methods base their teaching and learning on allowing students to integrate clinical skills and knowledge. Therefore, it is vital for the students undertaking nursing to be able to put into practice in the clinical context what they learn in classroom. It is appropriate hence, to apply human simulation as an educational strategy to achieve these outcomes because it uses active learning (Cant, 2010). The discussions of the study together with recommendations relate to the study because they prove the hypotheses, answer the questions and objectives of the study. Further, the researchers have justified the topic of the study to test and interpreted accordingly. In their interpretations, the researchers have suggested interventions that will assist the students in support of learning and will improve their confidence in calculation. The data collected and findings validated the significance of adopting hands-on clinically appropriate style for numeracy learning. A clinical approach by the nursing tutor and a different analytical approach by the numeracy tutor. The suggestions to adopt a hands on approach to improve competence in numeracy learning emanated from the findings which displayed a significant improvement in the way the students conducted their clinical affairs particularly in mitigating numeracy error (Lindquist, 2014). The language used is understandable, simple and clear. From the onset, the author has clearly explained the purpose of the study, giving the reader a general idea of the study and what to expect before delving into the article in depth. The visual material is easy to follow and clearly marketing. The material helps the researcher clearly understand the numerical and statistical data effectively. The material used display a lot of information and the reader will easily and quickly make an analysis of the data to draw out findings. The researcher gets a fast overview of the findings of the study. The study adopted both qualitative and quantitative approaches that gave the researcher accurate results with which to draw the findings. The weaknesses of the study were that, the instrument that the researcher used to draw results was not validated with too many options on the scale used Likert scale.(Artino et al. 2011) states that the usage of seven to nine scales may not be relevant to many respondents and will not improve the reliability. The study was also carried out during the last week of teaching instead of midway during the week. This carrying out may have caused generalization of the study by the researcher. A blended approach of learning other than hands on approach is ideal in this study. According to As Tsai et al (2011), face to face instruction is not as advantageous as blended learning as this kind of approach provides the student with a more memorable learning platform. The study has been carried out with expertise of high quality. The researcher has used both qualitative and quantitative surveys to derive his findings. Further, the researcher has analysed the study objectively giving the benefits and weaknesses of each approach adopted giving findings, recommendations and suitable conclusion for the study. The researcher also accompanies the findings with charts, statistics and proper references for the literature study. In the study, he displays depth, originality and presents the paper in high standard with originality, constructively critical and analytical with peer reviewed references. This study can be compared to another journal High Fidelity Simulation in Nursing Education where nursing students go through shock while taking practical learning lessons. Advanced technology can improve the learning system of participation and communication with the students as it assists the student to participate in active learning, with diverse interaction and experiences (DSouza, 2013). High-fidelity simulation for human patients makes use of virtual model or regular patients in simulated scenarios that are life-like, and realistic. HFS may expand the thinking of the student, and ability to make decisions and handle emotions effectively. The study is objective as it outlines the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches used and gives conclusion with relation to the findings without any biases whatsoever. The author uses online style of answering questions and pen and paper and further gives the pros and cons of each. The author is credible as he has previously had a few publications and acknowledges scholars who have helped him in this research stu References Artino, A.R., Gehlbach, H., Durning, S.J., 2011. AM Last Page: Avoiding five common pitfalls of survey design. Academic Medicine 86 (10), 1327. Cant, R. P., Cooper, S. J. (2010). Simulation?based learning in nurse education: systematic review.Journal of advanced nursing,66(1), 3-15. Chan, Z. C. Y. (2010).Clinical research issues in nursing. New York: Nova Science Books. DSouza MS, Jose, J., and Al-Jabri, S., 2013. perceptions of teaching undergraduate student. Journal of scientific research, 111(3), pp.289299. Harrigan, J., Classroom Productions. (2012). Nursing assessment. Cypress, CA: Medcom. Lindquist, R., Snyder, M., Tracy, M. F. (2014).Complementary alternative therapies in nursing. Ramjan, L.M., 2011. Contextualism adds realism: Nursing students' perceptions of and performance in numeracy skills tests. Nurse Education Today 31 (8), e16e21. Romero, M., Barber, E., 2011. Quality of E-learners' time and learning performance beyond quantitative time-on-task. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 (5), 16. Tsai, C.W., Shen, P.D., Tsai, M.C., 2011. Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students' learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour Information Technology management 30 (2), 261271. Winland-Brown, J. E., Henry, J., Perez, V. (2013).Nursing.